scotus
-
The Supreme Court has turned down a case challenging a COVID-era admissions policy meant to racially and geographically diversify three highly selective Boston public schools. While the policy has since been replaced, a group of white and Asian parents sued the district, claiming that although it appeared to be race neutral, in practice it disproportionately…
-
Chloe Miracle-Rutledge is a JURIST Supreme Court Correspondent and a 2L at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, DC.
-
In the two weeks since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a 40-year-old precedent that gave federal agencies wide latitude in interpreting the laws they enforce, there has been widespread concern that an activist judiciary will thwart regulators’ efforts to protect public health and safety.
-
Federal prosecutors have asked the US Supreme Court to decide whether Donald Trump has immunity from prosecution on charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election — © AFP Brendan SMIALOWSKI
-
The Supreme Court decided Thursday that government officials cannot indirectly suppress free speech through coercion, reinforcing their previous decision in Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan.
-
Help fund stories like this. Donate now!
-
Federal prosecutors have asked the US Supreme Court to decide whether Donald Trump has immunity from prosecution on charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election — © AFP Brendan SMIALOWSKI
-
Gijs de Bra is a JURIST Assistant Editor and SCOTUS special correspondent, and a 2L at Cornell Law School.
-
Marissa Zupancic is JURIST’s Washington DC Correspondent, a JURIST Senior Editor and a 3L at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. She’s stationed in Washington during her Semester in DC.
-
reader comments 51